What I am Missing in Most GenAI Conversations

When people talk about Generative AI, the focus is usually on:

  • Prompting
  • LLMs
  • Chatbots
  • Proofs of Concept (POCs)

But what I am missing a lot in those conversations are:

  1. Try classic automation first
  2. Process integration: Can I add it into a process so that it fixes a problem?
  3. Data privacy
  4. Security
  5. Works council/employee representation (if applicable)
  6. Observability (not just the usual observability but also prompts and responses)
  7. Robust data pipelines (a.k.a ETL)
  8. Model Selection
  9. Model decay & re-evaluation (How often will you need to update? Currently about ~1x / year)
  10. Regulatory Compliance AI Act (EU)
  11. Costs (Tokens, maintenance, scaling — over years, not demo days)
  12. Scalability
  13. Latency & Performance:
  14. Testing (“it works in demo” ≠ “it works in production with real users”)
  15. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL):
  16. The other 95% of the app (The “boring” software stack around the AI)
  17. APIs (If it’s meant to automate, it needs to talk to other systems)

If there’s a user interface:

  • Interface design & UX (no one uses what they can’t understand)

And the elephant in the room:

  • How do you address the fear—justified or not—that you might be innovating people out of their jobs?

Fediverse reactions

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *