Bookwyrm — One Month In

A month ago, I wrote that I would like to try Bookwyrm (#Bookwyrm: a social network for tracking your reading, talking about books. More on https://joinbookwyrm.com). Now, one month and three books later, it might be a good time to write about my first impressions.

OpenLibrary?!

There are definitely some arguments to use Bookwyrm and related services. With related I mean the OpenLibrary: https://openlibrary.org/! An Open Data platform for all books etc! Actually, I thought such a catalogue would be freely available already, for example from the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. But OpenLibrary displays the Data also nicely with (I think) more data.

It sounds like a nice project I’d be willing to contribute when I get new books. I try to resist the urge to check all the books that I have :-D.

Back to Bookwyrm

Okay, back to Bookwyrm! When the book is in the OpenLibrary, it’s rather easy to add it to my reading list (thanks to @juergen_hubert@mementomori.social for this hint). Also adding comments, reviews or quotes is pretty easy …

As long as you’re on the desktop. Unfortunately, I don’t find the webpage very mobile-friendly. Especially as I am usually not at the PC when I’m reading a book. At best, I have my cell phone within reach. — Don’t get me wrong: it all works, but I feel like it could be ways better on the mobile.

Do I go on?

On the other side: how often do I really comment or write a review? A review, well: when I finish (or cancel) a book: not too often. The not-so-mobile friendliness isn’t a killer, though.

And as I don’t really seek huge conversations about books, it is mostly about reviews in my case. Honestly, I think, I never wrote book reviews before. I never wanted to feed my contribution to any company where I’m not able & allowed to reuse the data. To me it was always like working for free. Especially as my review would always be just on one site, one shop — one of many.

If I want to write a review, I want to review the book. Not the book on one particular site. And even though Bookwyrm is by far not THE central review site (yet), it is open – and it is part of the .

Coming back to the initial question: Do I go on? Yes, I think so. Obviously, it will be small contributions only. But as usual: if everyone contributes a bit, the result is huge.

Fediverse Reactions

Comments

7 responses to “Bookwyrm — One Month In”

  1. Jürgen Hubert Avatar

    @blog

    My primary use case for #BookWyrm is keeping track of the books I already have, so that I don't get duplicates. Though I do hope to publish the occasional review.

  2. Skivling Avatar

    @blog @juergen_hubert The most I can manage is a star rating and maybe 1-2 sentences on how I found the book and if I generally recommend it or not.

    1. Franz Avatar
      Franz

      That’s – I think the same for me.

  3. Kalle Kniivilä Avatar

    @blog @juergen_hubert Bookwyrm could definitely benefit from some UI improvements, but it's already pretty good. Many Finnish books were missing in the available databases, but the Finnish Bookwyrm instance kirja.casa made it easy to import any book from the Finnish library data base, which was a great improvement.

    #Bookwyrm

    1. Franz Avatar
      Franz

      What’s your main use Case to use bookwyrm if I may ask, @kallekn?
      From what I’ve seen, some/most(?) people keep track on what they’ve read so far. I’m just wondering if other people use it for other (main) purposes, too.

      1. Kalle Kniivilä Avatar

        @blog Keeping track of what I've read, but also writing about books I've read and finding out about books I might like to read. Isn't that what it's for?

      2. Franz Avatar
        Franz

        Sure, sure. Just in my case for example I do not even use the “what I’ve read” feature because I (currently) have this all in calibre. So I’m just curious if I’m missing something that I just haven’t thought of or discovered yet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *